Seeing is what our
eyes do, smelling is what our nose does, and so on. “The mind is what our brain
does,” says Canadian-American evolutionary scientist Steven Pinker. This
sentence needs further qualification: The mind is what our brain does–more
precisely, what our prefrontal cortex does–and the brains of other animals do
not. Mind is the complex of elements in our brain that feels, perceives, wills,
remembers, reasons and is conscious of the self that owns that brain.
Is the mind a sixth
sense? The Buddha thinks so. The answer to this question invites controversy
since there is no agreement on the number of ‘senses’ we possess. However, the statement
that the mind is indeed a sense implies that, as the other five, it is also a biological
phenomenon and a product of evolution by natural selection.
Regarding its
biological nature, says the English philosopher Gilbert Ryle, “minds are not
ghosts harnessed to bodily machines”. There are no separate workings of the
mind and workings of the body. Without metaphysical interventions, mind
'occurs’ in the brain, which is a part of the body.
With respect to
evolution, the five traditional senses preceded by eons the hypothetical sixth
one. Likely smell was first. Millions of years ago, one of the things that
rudimentary live entities did, besides copying themselves, was learning to
perceive the odors of the molecules they would seize for their organisms;
current plants, which lack sensory organs, do smell one another.
In an extremely slow
sequence, living beings were able to taste, touch, hear and see. Then, a few
moments ago in the 3,500-million-year timeline of life, our hominid ancestors,
able to ponder and recognize their existence, made their unexpected appearance.
How could this happen?
At some point, as a
result of genetic mutations, some distant ancestors developed a rudimentary
consciousness the progress of which became an evolutionary reward to a number
of qualities that favored survival.
In a thought
experiment, Portuguese-American neurobiologist Antonio Damasio compares the potential
for survival of two remote anthropoid apes, one with some elementary hints of a
mental function, a bit of personal history or a very simple grasp of
individuality, and a second one with no trace of mind, memory or sense of
identity.
The first ape, when
facing a certain threat, not only experienced fear and made instinctive
fight-or-flight decisions, as would any mammal, but also he or she could recall
previous similar circumstances and reproduce actions that had already proved
helpful. The odds of survival of that first anthropoid were certainly higher
than those of the second primate; every success of the latter, the ‘oblivious’
one, was exclusively random.
Whether or not a
sense, it is clear that mental faculties, including the recognition of the self,
are the result of evolution by natural selection; alternatives to this line of
thought require metaphysical beliefs.
With no notion of the
evolution of species, the Buddha is very specific about the material nature of the
sense of identity. The Sage declares that “there is no supernatural expression in
the body, the sensory signals, the perceptions, the mental formations
(conditionings) or the consciousness of a human being”. Twenty four centuries
later, naturalist Charles Darwin, the first person ever to speak about evolution
and evolutionary psychology, shows how species transformed to reach modern man,
the top bough of the hierarchy of life.
All our mental
faculties, including the construction of our identity, are biological phenomena
improved through time by natural selection. The acceptance of this fact puts
our feet on the ground; this is what is important. The acceptance or rejection
of the mind as a sixth sense is a secondary issue.
Atlanta, September 18, 2014
www.harmonypresent.com
Atlanta, September 18, 2014
www.harmonypresent.com
No comments:
Post a Comment